Plugin
16minds
16-minds summons agents modeled on 16 distinct personality types — each with its own values, thinking patterns, and tone — to debate, review, or advise on any topic. Each personality is written directly into an independent prompt, so outputs carry visibly different voices instead of the averaged answer a single agent tends to produce. Three commands cover the range: - /mind <type> — a single type's opinion - /pair <a> <b> — a two-type debate (open → rebut → reply / synthesize) - /minds — fan out to all 16 in parallel, then synthesize Three modes (light / middle / heavy) trade depth for token cost. The /minds synthesis follows a fixed 4-section rubric — score distribution, axes of disagreement, easily-overlooked perspectives, and landing-zone candidates with per-candidate "types likely to agree / fit / risk" — to keep 16-voice output structured rather than scattershot. The --save flag writes the full execution log to a file for use as article material or decision logs. Built for decisions where a single averaged answer would lose the edges: idea generation, design judgment, code review, and life/career questions.
- Analysed
- Last observed
What the code does
Static analysis found none of the capabilities we track, such as shell commands, network requests or file writes, in the latest version.
Having a capability is not wrongdoing; many tools need these to do their job. It tells you what to check before you install.
This is public metadata, not a safety certification or complete assessment. Static analysis cannot establish what a tool does at runtime.
Risk
Sign in to see this tool's overall risk level and what drives it. Free.
Coverage
Detailed report
1 finding from automated static analysis of the latest version, with severities and explanations.
Using this tool across your team? We can assess your whole inventory.
Request an inventory assessment