Verune

Plugin

16minds

16-minds summons agents modeled on 16 distinct personality types — each with its own values, thinking patterns, and tone — to debate, review, or advise on any topic. Each personality is written directly into an independent prompt, so outputs carry visibly different voices instead of the averaged answer a single agent tends to produce. Three commands cover the range: - /mind <type> — a single type's opinion - /pair <a> <b> — a two-type debate (open → rebut → reply / synthesize) - /minds — fan out to all 16 in parallel, then synthesize Three modes (light / middle / heavy) trade depth for token cost. The /minds synthesis follows a fixed 4-section rubric — score distribution, axes of disagreement, easily-overlooked perspectives, and landing-zone candidates with per-candidate "types likely to agree / fit / risk" — to keep 16-voice output structured rather than scattershot. The --save flag writes the full execution log to a file for use as article material or decision logs. Built for decisions where a single averaged answer would lose the edges: idea generation, design judgment, code review, and life/career questions.

Analysed
Last observed

What the code does

Static analysis found none of the capabilities we track, such as shell commands, network requests or file writes, in the latest version.

Having a capability is not wrongdoing; many tools need these to do their job. It tells you what to check before you install.

This is public metadata, not a safety certification or complete assessment. Static analysis cannot establish what a tool does at runtime.

Risk

Sign in to see this tool's overall risk level and what drives it. Free.

Sign in to see the risk level

Coverage

Complete static analysis

How coverage is measured

Detailed report

1 finding from automated static analysis of the latest version, with severities and explanations.

Sign in to view detailed report

Using this tool across your team? We can assess your whole inventory.

Request an inventory assessment